|
What is the problem?
Each day an estimated 50-70 trains pass through Voorheesville. The blasts of train horns disturb sleep and conversation; reduce
property values; and can contribute to stress and hearing loss. Since the 1980s the volume of train traffic in Voorheesville has more than doubled. It will likely continue to increase as the economy improves, the population grows, and rising costs of gasoline make shipping goods by train more economical. Even those
not living near the train are exposed to the noise when using the Village Park
or walking in the center of the village. Trains are a part of Voorheesville’s
history and play a vital role in our economy. They were here before we came and
will likely be here when we are gone. While we cannot reduce the amount of train traffic we can do something about train horn noise.
What are quiet zones?
Federal regulations
enacted in 2005 and amended in 2006, permit the establishment of railroad quiet zones, that is, areas in which trains will not sound their
horns as they approach and enter the railroad crossing. The
regulations specify the kinds of safety improvements that are required for the
quiet zones. There are currently 492
quiet zones in the U.S. Prior to the regulations 1374 quiet zones had been established. Hundreds of communities across the US, many like Voorheesville, have
implemented quiet zones that are safe, workable and affordable. A
quiet zone in Voorheesville would bring peace of mind, increase property values
and create a more attractive environment in the downtown area in which new businesses could locate.
The Public Authority responsible for maintaining the
roadways that cross the tracks takes the lead in establishing the quiet
zone. In our case it is Albany County. However, the support of the Voorheesville
Village Board of Trustees is important to that task. In New York State several
communities are in various stages of exploring, planning, implementing or
enjoying a quiet zone. These include Cohoes,The Town of Hamburg, Kingston, Little Neck and Rockland County.
Are quiet zones safe?
In a quiet zone the engineer can always sound his horn in any type of emergency or hazardous situation, for example, when there
are pedestrians, workers or vehicles on the tracks. All railroad crossings will continue to have gates,
bells and flashing lights. Signs will be posted indicating that the train will
not sound its horn. As shown by the Federal Railroad Administration, the safety
upgrades that are required for establishing a quiet zone more than compensate for
the increased risk that comes with silencing of the horns. A quiet zone would
be SAFER than what we now have in Voorheesville.
What kind of safety
improvements are required for a quiet zone?
Four of the most common safety improvements are: 1) adding 2 gates to an existing 2 gate system
to create “four-quadrant gates”; 2) constructing
median barriers down the center of the road that extend 100 feet from each gate (less in some
circumstances). These barriers prevent a motorist from driving around a lowered
gate; 3) constructing “channelization” devices that function in the same way as
median barriers but at considerably lower cost; and 4) installing wayside horns which,
stationed at the crossing, create a train horn sound except that the sound is focused down toward traffic and is therefore limited to the immediate
vicinity of the railroad crossing. The
above four approaches are known under federal regulations as Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs).
Recognizing that one size does not fit all, the regulations provide for Alternative Safety Measures, (ASMs) that can be used where there are unique
circumstances that prevent the full implementation of SSMs. ASMs must be
approved by the Federal Railroad Administration.
See the Photo page in this website for a possible quiet zone in Voorheesville using channelization devices or median barriers.
Examples of Supplemental Safety Measures (SSMs)
What is the
cost?
Cost estimates vary widely depending on the type of safety
measure implemented. Every situation is unique; using the internet to research
costs of existing quiet zones we have acquired the following information:
Four-quadrant gates are by far the most expensive solution
with costs in the range of $400,000-$500,000 per crossing.
Median barriers cost from $30,000 to $60,000 per crossing, but costs could go higher to the extent that the road needs to be widened or
redirected. Channelization devices according to one vendor, Qwick Kurb, cost
$12,000 per crossing plus installation costs. Channelization devices, while less durable than median barriers, have
been used successfully in northern climates with heavy snowplow usage.
Wayside horns can be expected to cost $100,000 to $125,000
per crossing according to one vendor, Railroad Controls Limited. The costs
consist of the horn itself, installation, and tie-in to the railroad crossing circuitry, the tie-in being the most
expensive component. There are also annual maintenance costs associated with
each option. Maintenance cost estimates are not available at this time, except
to say that costs for four-quadrant gates and wayside horns would be much higher than
for median dividers or channelization devices.
What funding is
available?
Funding for quiet zones is available from a variety of sources including the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (see page 13 of report), federal stimulus funding, transportation grants,
and special legislative grants. In the case of New York, the Town Hamburg quiet
zone received a $475,000 grant through
Senator Schumer. The Little Neck quiet zone received $250,000 through Congressman Gary Ackerman and also State Senator Frank Padavan , Rockland County received
$3.5 million through Congresspersons Engel, Lowey and Kelly. NYS Senate Majority Leader, Dean Skelos, has also been supportive of quiet zones .
Financing by long term bonds, for example, $300,000
borrowed over 20 years at 4%, would average out at less than 6 cents a day per
village household. This amount would be reduced by any grants obtained.
Efforts to Date
In
March 2012 the Committee for a Quiet Zone in Voorheesville met with Mayor Conway to ask for the support of the Board of
Trustees to explore the development of a quiet zone. He agreed to consult with Congressman Tonko’s office to see
if funding were available and get back to us. Two months later the Mayor
reported that there was no funding available.
Over
the summer Voorheesville residents, representing a wide range of areas of the
village, wrote letters to the Altamont Enterprise expressing their problems with
train horns and supporting the idea of a quiet zone. (See the Letters/Press page of this website.) In August we presented a petition
to the Board of Trustees containing the signatures of 358 Village residents asking the
Board to take the necessary steps to initiate the development of a quiet zone. Since that time many more residents have added their names to our mailing list. The board agreed to seek
funding for a preliminary study of quiet zone options.
The view of the Committee for a Quiet Zone in Voorheesville is that both the four-quadrant gate and the median barrier options need to be studied. However, the study that was conducted considered only four-quadrant gates, the most costly option.
The study results were presented in December at which time the the Board stated that, although funds were available to study the median option, the study would not go forward because the county had certain objections to median barriers. The Board was unable to say what those objections were.
The Board held a meeting in January at which time Commissioner Duncan of the Albany County Department of Public Works presented a short memo stating his issues with median barriers. There was no opportunity to question him further nor to share any information that the Committee had obtained which could address his concerns.
In February the Committee for a Quiet Zone in Voorheesville presented a proposal for a Voorheesville quiet zone to the Board. Also included in that presentation were specific responses to the points in Mr. Duncan's memo that we asked the Board to convey to him. The Village Board took the view that it would be better to ask Mr. Duncan first to clarify his objections to median barriers before responding to the points in his memo. The Village Board and the Committee jointly developed a set of questions which the Mayor sent to Mr. Duncan in March. Mr. Duncan has informed us that a response will be forthcoming in April.
|